‘Blank cheque’ plan would be multi-billion pound nuclear U-turn

8 October 2012

 

THE COALITION is set to break yet another promise with a blank cheque for the nuclear industry which will force the taxpayer to hand billions of pounds over to private businesses, if Conservative Energy Minister, John Hayes gets his way.

 The new energy minister describes himself as “extraordinarily enthusiastic about nuclear” and “arguably the most pro-nuclear energy minister in living memory... I suppose ever”.

 He has announced that the government is not averse to considering underwriting the cost of building new nuclear power stations – effectively handing taxpayers’ money directly to private companies.

 Green Party member and energy policy expert David Toke said: ‘This is the latest confirmation that nuclear energy is so wildly expensive that private firms are not willing to risk spending money on it. We now have a situation in which the taxpayer has to pay private companies for energy, and now also has to hand over extra cash simply to make sure the same companies make a profit.’

 Mr Hayes’ announcement marks the first step towards a multi-billion pound government U-turn.

 In March 2010, the Conservative Party told the country that: ‘Taxpayer and consumer subsidies should not and will not be provided (to the nuclear industry) – in particular there must be no public underwriting of construction cost overruns.’

 And on May 22 this year, Energy Secretary Ed Davey told the BBC that: ‘There will be no blank cheque for nuclear - unless they are price competitive, nuclear projects will not go ahead.’  

 But Mr Toke said: ‘This is the exact opposite of what the government has told us from the start. Nuclear energy is not price competitive. It receives massive subsidies, and this measure simply means companies can charge the government for building power stations which will then make private firms money.’

The most advanced new nuclear power station plans are those for an EDF plant at Hinckley Point, Somerset, which requires an estimated £14bn investment to be built.

 Mr Toke said: ‘This rule simply means that EDF can name a price which is far lower than what the final cost will actually be, enabling the company to receive massive payments direct from the taxpayer to give it huge profits.’

 The proposals also signal clear government intent to hand nuclear energy firms an advantage over renewable energy producers, said Mr Toke.

 ‘In 2008, the government said the cost of nuclear energy would be £38 per megawatt hour. But EDF is now telling the government its costs for producing nuclear energy will be £165 pmWh. It’s a huge increase. Well above the costs of renewable resources, such as offshore wind which costs £135 pmWh, and is decreasing in price each year.

 ‘But the government’s response is to stand by while solar energy producers go bust, and write a blank cheque for the nuclear industry. If nuclear energy is not cost-effective, we should not be using it, and if it is, then this unfair underwriting is not necessary.’ 

 ENDS

For more information contact Zoe Hall on 0207 549 0315 or zoe.hall@greenparty.org.uk

Notes to Editors

1.       David Toke is the University of Birmingham’s senior lecturer on energy policy.

2.       Mr Hayes’ comments were made to the Sunday Telegraph on Sunday October 7. To see the report, visit: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/9591653/Government-mulls-underwriting-risk-of-new-nuclear-plants.html

3.       For more information about the Green Party visit: http://www.greenparty.org.uk/

 

 

 


Back to main news page